Every now and then you get a revisionist account of Vietnam that argues that the U.S. military knew what it was doing and could have won the war if not for the hippies, the journalists, and the politicians. Sorley makes a decent case that the war under the command of General Creighton Abrams was not a complete disaster, and even goes so far as to argue that the war was practically won by 1970, after the Viet Cong were virtually annihilated by their disastrous Tet Offensive. The argument goes that the process of Vietnamization was too rapid and the United States withdrew its support of South Vietnam too precipitously for the South to hang on to its gains. The American people and their government simply lost their will to win the war. So…did Walter Cronkite lose the war? There are a lot of ifs and might-have-beens in this book that incline one to think that Sorley protests too much, but he makes as good a case as anyone for the revisionist theory. Kudos for a determined effort.
Permanent link to this article: https://www.thefrumiousconsortium.net/2012/05/18/a-better-war-by-lewis-sorley/
Permanent link to this article: https://www.thefrumiousconsortium.net/2012/05/13/the-proud-tower-by-barbara-tuchman/
Apr 19 2012
King John by William Shakespeare
This play is surprisingly good for one of Shakespeare’s lesser known works. It is a story of shifting alliances and treachery in a world that is constantly uncertain. Surprisingly, a character known simply as “the Bastard,” who is surely fictional, is the central and most sympathetic character in the story, proving himself a pole of constancy and unbroken loyalty in an ever-changing and faithless world. King John himself is hardly sympathetic, but his enemies are hardly any more noble. This is a very short drama, but it packs a punch, and it seems to me unjustly overlooked among Shakespeare’s admittedly massive canon.
Permanent link to this article: https://www.thefrumiousconsortium.net/2012/04/19/king-john-by-william-shakespeare/
Apr 15 2012
The Myth of Mental Illness by Thomas Szasz
Dr. Szasz seems to regard mental illness as a moral failure rather than a genuine illness, and he seems to think the mentally ill deserve judgment rather than treatment. Most mentally ill patients, he believes, are merely social misfits and malingerers rather than people suffering from a disease. His arguments are philosophical rather than scientific, but they are nevertheless somewhat cogent. Unfortunately, the mental illness he chiefly focuses is on is “hysteria,” which, as anyone who has looked at the DSM-IV knows, is merely one of hundreds of mental illnesses that afflict modern man. Moreover, his arguments seem to be chiefly a reaction against Freudian psychoanalysis, which mainstream modern psychiatry has already mostly discredited. Dr. Szasz’s case is not entirely without merit, but anyone who has been around someone with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or severe depression can tell that something is seriously wrong and that the illness is not imaginary. Wrong, Dr. Szasz.
Permanent link to this article: https://www.thefrumiousconsortium.net/2012/04/15/the-myth-of-mental-illness-by-thomas-szasz/
Apr 06 2012
Hollywood by Charles Bukowski
Before I discuss the book, a word about Bukowski. Bukowski has a way of making it seem that a life of sin is good for your soul and that people who live virtuous lives are dull people with dead souls. I am rather skeptical of this philosophy, but every time I read about his adventures with booze and women I tend to feel that I am missing something in life. Bukowski represents the realization of the fantasy most men have of saying fuck you to the system and the routine and getting away with it. This book is a memoir of the making of the movie Barfly, which he wrote the screenplay for and which is based on his early life. Bukowski has a well known contempt for Hollywood types, whom he considers phonies, hacks, hustlers, and hucksters, and his rendering of his immersion in this world is funny and memorable. And by the way, I have seen the movie: the book is better.
Permanent link to this article: https://www.thefrumiousconsortium.net/2012/04/06/hollywood-by-charles-bukowski/
Mar 06 2012
‘Salem’s Lot by Stephen King
It is refreshing to read a novel about vampires in which vampires are scary monsters and not romantic sex symbols. This book is a good creepy read, and even though it is only the second novel King wrote, it is clearly one of his finest. The only flaw is that it goes on for a hundred pages after it logically should have ended. But it is a good, suspenseful page turner…and SCARY. Not a book for bienpensants or pollyanna sensibilities.
Permanent link to this article: https://www.thefrumiousconsortium.net/2012/03/06/salems-lot-by-stephen-king/
Feb 20 2012
Napoleon by Frank McLynn
This is the best and most balanced biography of Napoleon I have read so far. It contains much excellent scholarship and critical commentary; however, it also contains a lot of amateur Freudian analysis that is pure rubbish. While I am neither a warmonger nor an imperialist, I find it hard to read a biography of Napoleon without rooting for him. For all his faults–and this book discusses them in detail–he remains the outstanding military leader of the gunpowder age.
Permanent link to this article: https://www.thefrumiousconsortium.net/2012/02/20/napoleon-by-frank-mclynn/
Feb 15 2012
Christianity and Culture by T.S. Eliot
This collection of essays was written on the eve of World War II, but the question it poses is highly relevant for our time, particularly for people like me: what role, if any, should Christianity play in a modern democracy? In what way is Christianity connected to contemporary culture, and in what ways should it influence that culture? There is far more discussion of culture than Christianity in this book; culture and not Christ is obviously what is dearest to the heart of a poet and literary scholar like Eliot; not once does he ever make reference to Jesus or any of His doctrines. According to Eliot, there are strong cultures and weak cultures. Again, as a poet and scholar, he has rather peculiar notions of what makes a culture strong, as if there is an obvious connection between Shakespeare and nuclear physics. Eliot’s thesis of culture as social capital is basically Matthew Arnold revisited, but it is a thesis worth revisiting, even if history has rather unevenly shown its merit.
Permanent link to this article: https://www.thefrumiousconsortium.net/2012/02/15/christianity-and-culture-by-t-s-eliot/
Feb 02 2012
A Brief History of the Cold War by Colonel John Hughes-Wilson
The author argues that the Cold War’s beginning was not in 1945 but in 1917. Some of his other judgments are even more controversial. He reveals that the Cuban missile crisis was not the only time during the Cold War when the United States went on DEFCON 3 alert, he believes Diem’s assassination in Vietnam was a CIA operation fully authorized by Kennedy, and he even believes the JFK assassination was carried out by the Mafia and that Oswald was indeed a patsy. Other judgments are more conventional but equally memorable: Reagan was a brilliant Cold Warrior who deserves to be remembered for that if nothing else, Bush was an incompetent bungler who hummed and hawed indecisively as the Soviet Union unraveled before his eyes, and Gorbachev… “Gorbachev stands as an almost heroic figure, who did more to end the Cold War than any other individual, although perhaps not in the way he had envisaged.” This is the best book to date I have read on the Cold War, and the author is not an American.
Permanent link to this article: https://www.thefrumiousconsortium.net/2012/02/02/a-brief-history-of-the-cold-war-by-colonel-john-hughes-wilson/
Jan 09 2012
A History of Warfare by John Keegan
This is Keegan’s best work. In most of his works he analyzes the science of warfare; in this book he also analyzes the psychology and culture of warfare. He takes exception from the beginning with Clausewitz’s dictum that war is politics by other means, and shows with ample evidence from history that war often is destructive of the political orders that it is supposed to preserve. The scope of his survey of warfare is impressive, ranging from prehistoric primitive warfare to the nuclear age. He is clearly an admirer of the warrior class and the warrior ethic, but he is no idealist or romantic when it comes to war, and he ends the book with the hope that man’s warmaking days will soon be over. Alas, I do not share his optimism, but I do share his love of good historical writing, of which this book is a shining example.
Permanent link to this article: https://www.thefrumiousconsortium.net/2012/01/09/a-history-of-warfare-by-john-keegan/