What’s the difference between a very long online discussion and a labyrinth? What if the thread is started by someone called Ariadne? “I shall construct a labyrinth in which I can lose myself, together with anyone who tries to find me — who said this and about what?” (p. 1) What if the participants all say they are each in a single room with minimal furnishings — these include a screen and a keyboard, of course — and a door that opens, for most of them, onto some kind of corridor?
The Helmet of Horror builds the twisty, turning, unthreaded conversation out to the length of a short novel in which the participants try to figure out their situations, try to meet up, and talk about what, if anything, it all means. The book was originally published in 2006, a time when fewer people had experience with long-running conversations of this sort, and far fewer in Pelevin’s native Russia. Reading it then, especially for people who were not early adopters of online life, would have seemed like encountering persons from a different world. Even today the book is a good representation of the idiosyncrasies of long online conversations. There’s topic drift, people pop in and out, some try to derail the discussion while others vent their annoyance, some make deeper connections and some play it all for laughs.
The cast of The Helmet of Horror includes Organizm(-: (complete with emoji every time), Romeo-y-Cohiba (whose cigar is not just a cigar) and Nutscracker at the start. Soon after the first three have described their similar situations with the single cell, Monstradamus shows up and asks to join, swiftly followed by the return of Ariadne, who says she fell asleep after starting the thread. In due course IsoldA turns up; her first posting explains to the guys something about manga and tentacle porn. Fortunately, Pelevin leaves a lot unsaid.