I Will Do Better by Charles Bock

subtitled A Father’s Memoir of Heartbreak, Parenting, and Love.

Perhaps my most popular and controversial review over on Goodreads is of an absolutely abysmal “parenting” memoir by a blogger who lost his wife in childbirth and struggled to raise their child on his own afterwards. I have genuine sympathy for his situation — with my co-parent overseas for weeks at a time, my experiences single parenting our three youngsters have been tough to miserable — but the prose is atrocious and the absolute lack of self-reflection worse. So when I started this book, I had an immediate flash of “oh no, are we going to go through that bullshit again?”

Readers, to my relief and hopefully yours, we are not.

Which isn’t to say that our author here, the novelist Charles Bock, is perfect. There are points in this memoir where I found this grown-ass man to be deeply and unnecessarily self-centered and irritating. But crucially as he’s writing about his past experiences, he recognizes that he really sucked during those less than stellar moments he’s describing. Most importantly, and as stated in the title and echoed like a refrain in the text, he affirms that he “will do better” and strives to follow through, for the sake of himself but mostly for the sake of the little girl who depends on him for everything.

Lucy Bock was almost three years old when her mother Diana died of cancer. In an effort to cheer her up on her first birthday without her mom, Charles ends up putting himself in the hospital. It’s a disastrous start to single parenthood but Charles resolves to keep trying, to keep doing better. Plenty of mistakes are made along the way, but he’s only human. And unlike some other oblivious parents, he knows when he’s messing up, knows when he’s being petty and selfish and unreasonable. He’s not a natural dad, admitting his thorough ambivalence to parenthood from the start, but he keeps choosing love, even when it’s hard and he’s ill-equipped to either give or receive it.

There’s a lot of self-owning here — the two-girlfriend situation is clearly the acting out of someone late to young adult drama, while the weird bargaining with both Lily and another exasperated parent when Lily refuses to give an acquaintance’s hairclip back is neediness presenting itself as permissive parenting — but Mr Bock doesn’t tell us these things to have us feel sorry for him or, worse, absolve him of his immaturity. Instead, he exposes the painful truth about himself to show that it’s possible to fuck up, and then to learn from it and become both a better father and person. There’s a particularly evocative passage near the end of the book, where he’s considering punching out a guy during the blackout that came on the heels of Hurricane Sandy. I was so worried that he was going to do something stupid, but reading his in-the-moment evaluation of all the repercussions that would come if he allowed himself to lose his temper finally assured me: he’s going to be okay. The Charles in the memoir is embracing maturity and accepting responsibility for his actions and learning how to be a good human being, one day at a time.

And so, ten years on (for writing the memoir, plus a few years for getting it polished and published,) he’s raised a child he’s proud of, and is deeply grateful for all the help he’s received along the way. Life hasn’t turned out the way he’s expected but he’s navigated the journey the best he can, accepting the existence of his negative feelings but refusing to wallow, and always, ALWAYS thoughtfully seeking to improve. That’s honestly a lot to be proud of, and an excellent lesson to share with other people and parents — and especially dads — who are going through what he did and/or want to know how he managed.

I Will Do Better by Charles Bock was published October 1 2024 by Abrams Press and is available from all good booksellers, including

Permanent link to this article: https://www.thefrumiousconsortium.net/2024/10/11/i-will-do-better-by-charles-bock/

5 comments

Skip to comment form

  1. Hi, I’m A in the book. And nothing Charles Bock has done with the publication of this memoir is admirable or to be praised whatsoever.
    He was already flirting with me, inviting me to his hotel room, and talking about divorcing his wife before she had cancer. During the year and a half we were together (only a portion of which is included in I Will Do Better, btw, I never knew about the other woman Z whatsoever. Only learned about her upon publication. At the end of our year and a half, he ghosted me. I didn’t hear from him for ten years. Now this comes out without any warning whatsoever. Letting people know they will be in your mainstream book, and how they will be written about, is extremely standard practice in publishing. He did none of that, and destroyed me all over again in the process.
    I’m suddenly just appearing in this book naked, saying things I didn’t say, doing things I didn’t do. And no way at all to correct any of it?
    Ghosting me and not talking to me for ten years is unbelievably cruel. To put me through the emotional wringer again ten years later with zero warning whatsoever is unbelievably cruel as well.
    And we’re also completely skipping all the emotional abuse he heaped on [moderator: redacted] after me? (In hindsight, meeting her, fully aligns with him ghosting me.)
    This man deserves zero praise. He has been awful to multiple women starting with his wife. Probably long before that as well. I Will Do Better? All of you, especially him, can do infinitely better.
    https://podcasts.apple.com/sn/podcast/comedy-journalist-julie-seabaugh/id1610162963?i=1000677732945

    1. I’m really sorry that happened to you, and I’m glad you’re getting your side of the story out. I’m not sure why you’re telling an overworked, underpaid book critic that I could do “infinitely better” tho: I’m not here to investigate the veracity of non-fiction but to discuss how entertained I was by it. I’m sure you wouldn’t walk into a bookstore and start screaming at a store clerk for carrying this memoir (at least I hope you wouldn’t, but I don’t know you!) Your perspective on this book is important, but please consider discussing your misdirected anger at me with a professional. Thank you for the rest of the comments tho!

        • TranscriptTranslation on January 25, 2025 at 4:07 pm
        • Reply

        I think it should be standard practice for a critic to not only give her opinion of whether she enjoyed a purportedly non-fiction book, but to also do a cursory examination of the issues of fact presented.

        In this case, any interest in triangulating the facts would prompt a reading of the excellent memoir Splinters by Charles Bock’s ex-wife, Leslie Jamison. In it, she recount “C”’s selfishness, petulance, and increasing verbal abuse, which does not stop with the dissolution of the marriage, but continues as their divorce settlement drags on for years and C uses their necessary interactions during shared custody of their toddler as opportunities to vent his spleen in scary and obscene outbursts.

        It may also be interesting to the reader to read Bock’s humblebragging autobio in People magazine promoting his book:
        https://people.com/charles-bock-glitterbugs-essay-exclusive-8723734

        I’ve got no skin in this game, but judging by the facts, the author is a not very decent, not very honest man short on true humility or self reflection. If you picked this guy or his book up, drop them back in the pile. Women can do better than this.

        1. Well, I think it should be standard practice for commenters on a book review to actually read the review and apply critical thinking skills to the critic’s opinion and subsequent responses.

          Someone with “no skin in the game” is for real telling me I should be “triangulating the facts” of an entire stranger’s life, two strangers if you count the other commenter (who, may I note, was never actually named in the book) as an integral part of this investigation? I, a book critic who was not paid for this review, am meant to perform “a cursory examination of the facts” by reading several hundred more pages of opinion on the author? Who do you think you are to demand more of my unpaid labor here?

          I am genuinely grateful y’all are expressing your opinion of him. I get it: you hate him (which also makes it WEIRD that you’d then link to a self-promoting article he wrote.) What I want to know is why you don’t bring it up with him, or post about it in the comments of the article on the website with the much greater reach that you just linked? Is it because I’m an easy target, and preaching to me – a person who doesn’t know him and doesn’t particularly like him, but who did find his book a thoughtful read – is a convenient way to pat yourself on the back for performing a feminism while actually doing nothing more useful than annoying a stranger?

          It is one thing to provide evidence to support your argument that he sucks. I welcome that. But it’s another thing entirely to scold me about what I should have known. I don’t appreciate having smug, rude people waltz into my comments and tell me I should have done deeper research. A truly “cursory examination” would show that he’s the kind of midlist published author and NYU professor who gets schmaltzy essays on parenting published on People.com. Y’all act like I need to run full background checks on authors before I review their books, and drop anyone who’s terrible at romantic relationships when they’re writing books about – *checks notes* – parenting. Only perfect people get to share their stories then, is that it? Flawed people can’t give good advice? A crap partner can’t offer solid tips on being a good parent?

          If you actually bothered to read the review, at no point do I fawn over his actions or rubber stamp his decision-making. I do laud the stated determination of the “Charles in the memoir” to reflect on his parenting and keep taking steps to improve. Does this somehow make me accountable for everything done by Charles in real life? Is it on me when he subsequently lapses or shows poor judgment in matters not touched on in his book?

          And honestly, would you even have the temerity to be commenting like this if one of my male colleagues had written this review? It’s really easy to displace your anger at a man on any woman even tangentially in his orbit, letting him off the hook while using the people he didn’t tell the full story to as your verbal punching bags. “She should have known” has been used to shame women for the actions of men since time immemorial. Instead of what’s really on the tip of my fingers to type here, I’ll just repeat your own words back to you: do better.

          Our website does not platform fascism or other cruelty-based ideologies but is otherwise a forum for expression and ideas – hence why your comments are all getting approved instead of being tossed on the digital rubbish heap. Also? At least Julie had the decency to put her real name to her comment and own it.

      • TranscriptTranslation on January 25, 2025 at 4:09 pm
      • Reply

      I posted here a reply to the blog critic you may find edifying.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.