Back in April when the finalists for the 2026 Hugo Awards were announced, your Frumious Consorters talked about what we liked in the nominations, what we were excited to find out more about, and what we hoped to actually read. Curious to discover how things turned out and what the Consortium thought? Read on!
Doug: The awards were awarded! A quick list of winners is here and the detailed report on votes and nominations is here. Who wants to kick off our round table of mixed metaphors?
Doreen: First off, thanks for the link to the report, that I absolutely pored over as I do every year! Just as interesting to me as knowing who won is knowing how the rest of the voting shook out. There were some surprises, especially in the categories Doug and I both managed to cover at TFC, but I think I’d like to talk about some of the non-surprises first. Such as A Wizard Of Earthsea‘s win in the Graphic Story category. I didn’t rate it highly myself, but I am completely unsurprised that more people were in agreeance with Doug and propelled it to the win. Also, apologies if I take a while to reply, I have been feeling rather poorly this last day or so and it has been vexing!
Emily: I read an email from Book Riot recently that described the Hugo as “Voted on by members, they fall somewhere between a typical literary award and a Goodreads Choice award: a popularity contest with a caveat.”
Personally, I’ve always considered the Hugo as a major professional award in SFF. Since you are both voters, how do you think of it?








